Messages, correspondence and records, presented with their source and context.
Communications relevant to the relationship, renewed contact, attempts to resolve the divorce and subsequent unwanted contact.
The indexed material concerns requests for contact details, references to a letter and cheque, and communications through family members.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
The bundle indexes screenshots concerning direct contact and disappearing-message settings. The settings alone do not establish a motive or intention.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
A supplied screenshot with a 17 July 2024 date header, showing a sexually explicit exchange with a contact saved as Lorenzo and a request for a video. Both incoming messages and the author’s replies remain visible.
Source: Screenshot supplied by the author; date read from the visible chat header.
This item documents the exchange shown on screen. It does not by itself establish the circumstances of any recording or what happened outside this excerpt.
A supplied screenshot with an 18 July 2024 date header. A contact saved as Lorenzo asks about an existing intimate video; the author replies. Both sides of the excerpt are retained.
Source: Screenshot supplied by the author; date read from the visible chat header.
The messages refer to an intimate recording. They do not establish when or how it was made, whether recording or sharing was consented to, or whether it was distributed.
Five supplied screenshots show photographs of marks on the wrist, ankle and arm, with messages reporting injury and attributing harm to the recipient. The messages refer to being punched or hit with objects, including a phone case.
Source: Screenshots supplied by the author.
The photographs and the accompanying statements are presented together. No calendar date is visible in these excerpts. The cause and timing of a mark cannot be established from a photograph alone.
Selected outgoing messages accompanying the supplied photographs:
“I do not deserve to be punched or hit hard with objects”
“I do not understand how it was possible for you to do this type of damage with a cell phone case, but you did. I am still in pain from this.”
“My arm also had a bruise”
Supplied screenshots and closer excerpts of a conversation saved as Lorenzo contain apologies, requests not to leave, expressions of guilt and statements about anger and wanting to change. Some excerpts show the same messages at a larger size. The author’s visible replies and existing blacked-out passages are preserved.
Source: Screenshots supplied by the author.
No calendar date is visible. General apologies are described according to their wording and are not presented as an admission to every alleged incident. No mental-health diagnosis is inferred from the messages.
Selected incoming messages from the supplied excerpts, with original spelling:
“I want change i dont want act like this all my life”
“Please baby i want act beter”
“I feel guilty”
“Ne me quitte pas”
The author writes that she is afraid of retaliation and reports being harmed in September and again yesterday and today. The other participant responds with concern and surprise.
Source: Screenshots supplied by the author.
The excerpt has no visible calendar date or year. Relative references such as yesterday and today have not been converted into timeline dates. The response is not labeled as an eyewitness account.
Two supplied excerpts discuss the relationship, express support and refer to advice to reduce alcohol consumption. One displays Friday, 12 June without a visible year.
Source: Screenshots supplied by the author; names and private details require review.
Public copies are pending privacy review. Statements about the relationship are not automatically treated as eyewitness evidence of an assault.
A supplied excerpt shows a 7 January 2019, 4:59 pm header above messages saying “Dont Leave” and “I want be beter” in a conversation saved as Lorenzo.
Source: Screenshot supplied by the author.
The visible date is recorded for this excerpt only. It has not been assigned to the other screenshots or treated as the date of a particular alleged assault. Parts of the conversation are obscured by the phone interface.
The author writes, “You are an adult and you need to control your anger” and “So I am suppose accept your abuse?” The incoming reply reads, “If i abuse you are going see what hapen”.
Source: Screenshot supplied by the author.
The wording is reproduced as shown, including spelling. Both the question and response are retained. No calendar date is visible; the excerpt is not used to date a specific incident.
Outgoing: “You are an adult and you need to control your anger”
Outgoing: “So I am suppose accept your abuse?”
Incoming: “If i abuse you are going see what hapen”
A supplied edited clip combines captioned allegations with a photograph of an ankle wound. The clip is presented as supplied.
Source: Edited video supplied by the author.
No event date is visible. The caption text and attribution are part of the supplied edit; the audio has not been independently transcribed.
A supplied edited recording displays WhatsApp excerpts with a 2 August 2024 header, discussing divorce and money. Both participants’ visible messages are preserved.
Source: Edited video supplied by the author.
The overlaid comments are part of the supplied edit. Statements in those comments about business funding are not established by the message excerpts themselves.
Material concerning reports I made, requests for help, administrative decisions and responses from authorities.
The document sets out my allegations and requests investigation. This index entry does not establish that the complaint was filed or that an investigation was opened.
Source: Prepared complaint document
Supplied photographs include a summons and pages of a trial-referral order naming Lorenzo Zezza in relation to cannabis-related conduct in 2010. The referral order records admissions and accounts from customers, and refers the case for trial. The summons schedules a hearing for 11 July 2013.
Source: Photographed court papers supplied by the author; authenticity not independently verified.
These pages concern allegations, recorded statements and procedural steps. No final trial judgment or sentence is shown. Copies remain outside the website package pending redaction of private and unrelated third-party information.
A supplied photograph of an initial Paris 11th-arrondissement police report is dated 3 February 2019 at 15:17. It records a report of partner violence dated 21 January 2019 at 06:10 and names Lorenzo Axel Zezza. A companion bilingual pre-declaration form is dated 3 February 2019.
Source: Supplied photographs of a police report and bilingual pre-declaration form; authenticity not independently verified.
The reported event date and the police-record date are separate. The form and report are presented as supplied sources, not as a trial judgment. The photographs still expose private details and remain outside the website download.
Supplied Sartrouville police pages include a receipt dated 7 September 2020 and an additional statement recorded that morning. The receipt lists a reported period from 21 January 2019 to 28 January 2020. The statement describes previous complaints, photographs and videos, fear that delayed providing them, and alleged threats and blows with a knife. It also refers to an earlier case concerning an incident dated 9 September 2019.
Source: Photographed police receipt and additional-statement pages supplied by the author; authenticity not independently verified.
The record documents the complaint and statements made to police on that date; it is not a trial judgment. Private contact details, addresses and birth information remain visible on some pages, so the photographs are not included in the website download.
The supplied redacted receipt is dated 30 March 2021 and records a complaint concerning repeated threats attributed to a current or former partner. The reported period is 29 March 2021 at 13:52 to 30 March 2021 at 00:22. Companion pages include an initial report, the recorded account and an additional report from the same day.
Source: Redacted police receipt supplied by the author; existing redactions preserved and authenticity not independently verified.
The receipt records a complaint, not a verdict. The accompanying narrative records what was told to police at the time, including the then-current description of the separation and expected divorce; those statements do not establish the final legal outcome. Only the safely redacted receipt is displayed. Other pages remain outside the download because they expose private or child-related information.
Documents relevant to the proceedings, my attempts to obtain information, and the matters I dispute about notice and participation.
The existing bundle indexes exchanges about finding a lawyer, fees, signatures and mutual-consent divorce arrangements.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
The email discusses finalizing the divorce and supplies an American address. My account explains that address as a mailing address and distinguishes it from my later London residence.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
The bundle indexes messages in which I asked again for the divorce to proceed and Lorenzo invoked a lack of money for a lawyer.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
My letter disputes the separation date and raises questions about the divorce and CARNI-related financial interests. It records my position.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
I asked for confirmation of any proceedings or judgment and copies of the documents. The email also asked Anne-Marie not to contact me about the matter.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
The letter requests Lorenzo’s lawyer’s details with a view to an amicable resolution.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
Original sources for the public statements and coverage discussed on this website.
The bundle identifies an excerpt recording separation since 29 July 2020. My correspondence disputes that as a definitive separation date.
Source: Existing case bundle — index and correspondence
Notices concerning account removals, my challenges to those actions and correspondence about reports I submitted.
A complaint, a message and an official finding are different types of material. Each item will identify what it is and its connection to the account.
Private information and unrelated third-party information will be removed. Intimate recordings and confidential information about children will not be published.
